Why College Athletes Should Not be Paid Argumentative Essay

November 14, 2022

The controversy about paying college athletes emerges mainly due to the revenues learning institutions generate from sports. Implementing a compensation plan for college athletes would require changing the existing structure and considering the students as professionals.

One of the major problems is that focus on individual sports would shift as students can prefer money to education and flock the well-paying competitive games.

Considering the circumstances, this article argues ten points against such plans to compensate college athletes for distinguishing them from professional players.

Contractual Disputes

Paying student-athletes for their participation in sports would need signing contracts that bear serious financial consequences upon breach for either party. Contracts mean bonuses, signing deals, and living up to performance standards to avoid being sold to other teams.

Implementing similar approaches to professional club management undermines the core business of educational institutions imparting knowledge and training people for various skills. You would experience disputes in payment contracts for teenagers juggling education and sports.

Creating Inconsistent Trends

Creating payment plans for college students would bring unprecedented concerns if high school and elementary students also demanded salaries and contracts for team membership. There should be no discriminative standards paying college athletes and leaving out high school players.

Stakeholders might grapple with teenagers striking and demanding special treatment in exchange for their games. Introducing payment structures can hardly establish acceptable standards to evaluate student-athletes according to value in different sports.

Education Standards will Diminish

A college education is crucial for developing learners to choose careers and establish their lives. Compensating the athletes in college can cause misplaced priorities because many students can choose the financial benefits over education and eventually fail to join professional teams.

College education should focus on creating learning platforms on different fronts to build a sustainable society with professional athletes, doctors, politicians, scientists, and other essential contributors to development.

Paying Athletes will Corrupt Recruitment

The money factor in sports influences the recruitment processes because other issues arise beyond the talent and skills of the athletes. There would be extensive disadvantages for smaller institutions experiencing financial constraints if more established colleges attracted all the best players for dominance.

College athletics could cease to focus on talent and education and bring unethical practices in training, facilitation, and competing ideologies. The amateur level in college athletics should nurture talents without attaching monetary value to the players.

Risk of Budget Strains

Different tertiary and secondary education institutions experience varying financial problems that could invite outsiders to fund the games as investments. Some college athletic teams do not achieve significant financial gains, and funds would be drawn from other departments to pay athletes.

The possible financial strain is unnecessary because learning institutions have different major agendas to address using limited resources. There are no justifications for reducing budgetary allocations for library equipment to pay athletes or slow down construction projects.

College Athletes Get Special Treatments

The athlete students should be compensated because they enjoy extensive privileges for their talents. Most colleges invest in their athletic teams by providing free access to gym and training facilities. The institutions cover health and insurance costs for the students and facilitate their activities and training. Student-athletes have many benefits because they attend school similarly to others, and their participation in sports does not deserve earnings. The students making extra money contradicts the essence of learning institutions in developing talents.

Scholarship Opportunities

There are scholarships for college athletes that facilitate them through their studies without paying and even earning stipends. There would be no need to allocate more funds to pay the college athletes because they already get facilitations for tuition, meal plans, and accommodation. Some colleges provide significant stipend amounts for the athletes, and the suggestion to include compensation would strain the scholarship program for other students. The sports activities are classified with other extra-curricular activities, and financial payments are unjustified.

Amateur Athletes are Different from Professionals

Introducing payment plans for college athletes could undermine sportsmanship because the players would start playing for money and demand distinctive salaries according to their perceived value. College students lack the experience and skill levels to match professional athletes, and financial disparities could affect teamwork practices. College students have to focus on many activities to graduate, unlike professional players who can dedicate time and resources to training and competitions.

Increased Pressure Disrupts Learning

College athletes in various sports can experience tremendous pressure from alums, coaches, and agents to increase their time in training due to the financial rewards at stake. Most young people require guidance to manage sports and education, and including the compensation idea exposes them to jeopardy. The pressure to perform and earn can force some athletes to remain in sports without full conviction to pursue them after graduating. The essential nurturing role of colleges can be lost because students will aim to make money while others focus on academics.

Compensating Student Athletes is Unsustainable

Many students participate in different sports, with options for everyone to at least join a school team for training and competing. A large number of student-athletes in categories such as swimming, board games, football, basketball, and many others would be strenuous to compensate. The sports departments would go into bad debt by sustaining student athletes’ payment agreements when there are no competitions or activities generating income. Besides, the payment plans ending after the college athletes graduate would disorient many people due to loss of income.


College athletes generate income for their institutions, but paying them and signing contracts can undermine the vital aspect of developing talents. The training sessions are demanding to the students, and the scholarship benefits are sufficient to motivate their contributions to the teams. It would be more constructive to extend scholarships to other students demonstrating distinctive abilities to ensure college education embraces diverse skills and prepares the graduates for life challenges. The suggestions to pay college athletes have more cons than pros, and the ideas are disconnected from the real challenges affecting other students with talents and exceptional skills.

About the author 

Antony W is a professional writer and coach at Help for Assessment. He spends countless hours every day researching and writing great content filled with expert advice on how to write engaging essays, research papers, and assignments.

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}